Skip to main content
Islandora
Electronic Theses & Dissertations
Athletic Training Theses
Comparison of Foam Rolling and Ischemic Compression in Treating Hamstring
All collections
Athletic Training Theses
Archives and Special Collections
Art and Sculpture
Artifacts and Memorabilia
Faculty, Staff and Administrator Publications
Photographs
Electronic Theses & Dissertations
University Records
Search box
search
Comparison of Foam Rolling and Ischemic Compression in Treating Hamstring
- Select bookmark list -
My Default List
Add to bookmark
Sheneberger, N. P. (2019). Comparison of Foam Rolling and Ischemic Compression in Treating Hamstring.
/eaststroudsburg/islandora/object/strou%3A81/datastream/PDF/view
Download
PDF
Metadata
MODS Metadata
Title
Comparison of Foam Rolling and Ischemic Compression in Treating Hamstring
Abstract
Both foam rolling (FR), and ischemic compression (IC) have been shown to be effective in treating muscle tightness, but the literature lacks studies comparing them. This study was a crossover design consisting of 11 healthy NCAA Division II and III collegiate basketball players. Subjects underwent, in a randomized order, 3 treatments: 1) 2x90s trials of FR, 2) 3x30-60s of IC and 3) No treatment; with a 1-week period between each treatment. Variables measure pre and post treatment were: active hamstring range of motion (ROM), pain-pressure threshold (PPT), vertical jump height (VJ), and peak power output (PPO). A global rate of change survey (GROC) was given to measure the subject’s perceived effect of the treatment. This study found, following each of the three treatments, a significant increase in ROM, VJ, and PPO. The improvement recorded in ROM, VJ and PPO does not appear to be the result of FR or IC.
Date
2019-05-10
Details
Title
Comparison of Foam Rolling and Ischemic Compression in Treating Hamstring
Creator
Sheneberger, Nathanet al
Subject
Description
Both foam rolling (FR), and ischemic compression (IC) have been shown to be effective in treating muscle tightness, but the literature lacks studies comparing them. This study was a crossover design consisting of 11 healthy NCAA Division II and III collegiate basketball players. Subjects underwent, in a randomized order, 3 treatments: 1) 2x90s trials of FR, 2) 3x30-60s of IC and 3) No treatment; with a 1-week period between each treatment. Variables measure pre and post treatment were: active hamstring range of motion (ROM), pain-pressure threshold (PPT), vertical jump height (VJ), and peak power output (PPO). A global rate of change survey (GROC) was given to measure the subject’s perceived effect of the treatment. This study found, following each of the three treatments, a significant increase in ROM, VJ, and PPO. The improvement recorded in ROM, VJ and PPO does not appear to be the result of FR or IC.
Publisher
Contributor
(Kelly Harrison, Ph.D.) (Thesis advisor), (Gerard Rozea, Ph.D.) (Committee member), (Keith Vanic, Ph.D.) (Committee member), East Stroudsburg University of Pennsylvania Athletic Training (Degree grantor), Sheneberger, Nathan P. (author)
Date
2019-05-10
Type
Text, Thesis
Format
electronic
Identifier
strou:81
Source
Language
eng
Relation
Coverage
Rights
author