Skip to main content
Islandora
Electronic Theses & Dissertations
History Theses
The American Struggle for the Interpretation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment
All collections
History Theses
Archives and Special Collections
Art and Sculpture
Artifacts and Memorabilia
Faculty, Staff and Administrator Publications
Photographs
Electronic Theses & Dissertations
University Records
Search box
search
The American Struggle for the Interpretation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment
- Select bookmark list -
My Default List
Add to bookmark
Edwards, T. (2020). The American Struggle for the Interpretation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment.
/eaststroudsburg/islandora/object/strou%3A152/datastream/PDF/view
Download
PDF
Metadata
MODS Metadata
Title
The American Struggle for the Interpretation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment
Abstract
Lawmakers interpreted the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution in a way that denied citizens their individual privileges and protections against unreasonable searches and seizures. To demonstrate this, primary and secondary sources were used including court cases, acts, laws, books, journals, periodicals, personal papers, correspondences, and government records. These sources have revealed that the historical ramifications of search and seizure laws and individual rights were intended to be interpreted based on the viewer’s surrounding culture. The larger implications of this researcher’s findings are that the Bill of Rights must be construed as a set of rules that can be interpreted in any era for the sake of all citizens to have equal access to life, liberty, and property.
Date
2020-08-7
Details
Title
The American Struggle for the Interpretation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment
Creator
et al
Subject
Description
Lawmakers interpreted the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution in a way that denied citizens their individual privileges and protections against unreasonable searches and seizures. To demonstrate this, primary and secondary sources were used including court cases, acts, laws, books, journals, periodicals, personal papers, correspondences, and government records. These sources have revealed that the historical ramifications of search and seizure laws and individual rights were intended to be interpreted based on the viewer’s surrounding culture. The larger implications of this researcher’s findings are that the Bill of Rights must be construed as a set of rules that can be interpreted in any era for the sake of all citizens to have equal access to life, liberty, and property.
Publisher
Contributor
Edwards, Timothy (author), (Christopher Brooks, Dr. Phil.) (Thesis advisor), (Michael Gray, PhD.) (Committee member), East Stroudsburg University of Pennsylvania History (Degree grantor)
Date
2020-08-7
Type
Text, Thesis
Format
electronic
Identifier
strou:152
Source
Language
eng
Relation
Coverage
Rights
author