Skip to main content
Islandora
Electronic Theses & Dissertations
Political Science Theses
Apples & Oranges: How Ghana's Political Economy Truly Compares with South Korea, and Brazil
All collections
Political Science Theses
Archives and Special Collections
Art and Sculpture
Artifacts and Memorabilia
Faculty, Staff and Administrator Publications
Photographs
Electronic Theses & Dissertations
University Records
Search box
search
Apples & Oranges: How Ghana's Political Economy Truly Compares with South Korea, and Brazil
- Select bookmark list -
My Default List
Add to bookmark
Tornyenu, D. D. (2020). Apples & Oranges: How Ghana's Political Economy Truly Compares with South Korea, and Brazil.
/eaststroudsburg/islandora/object/strou%3A148/datastream/PDF/view
Download
PDF
Metadata
MODS Metadata
Title
Apples & Oranges: How Ghana's Political Economy Truly Compares with South Korea, and Brazil
Abstract
This paper calls for a reexamination of the standard literature why Korea successfully used foreign aid while its peers continue to be aid dependent. My focus is on Ghana, Brazil, and South Korea, - the most representative examples of countries which used foreign assistance, had similar per capita gross domestic product (GDP) in the early 1960s, but which end up differently sixty years later. Salutary scholarship to South Korea's leapfrog industrialization and democracy between 1962-1980 is mainstream. Much of these unfairly presume my focus countries had identical aid flows to industrialize. This qualitative paper reappraises the key building blocks of Korea's successful development transition to clarify Ghana's growth collapse and Brazil's delayed ascent. The paper considers the weighty broader implications of America's Cold War policy objectives in addressing the replicability of the Korean “miracle” to other countries.
Date
2020-12-19
Details
Title
Apples & Oranges: How Ghana's Political Economy Truly Compares with South Korea, and Brazil
Creator
Subject
Description
This paper calls for a reexamination of the standard literature why Korea successfully used foreign aid while its peers continue to be aid dependent. My focus is on Ghana, Brazil, and South Korea, - the most representative examples of countries which used foreign assistance, had similar per capita gross domestic product (GDP) in the early 1960s, but which end up differently sixty years later. Salutary scholarship to South Korea's leapfrog industrialization and democracy between 1962-1980 is mainstream. Much of these unfairly presume my focus countries had identical aid flows to industrialize. This qualitative paper reappraises the key building blocks of Korea's successful development transition to clarify Ghana's growth collapse and Brazil's delayed ascent. The paper considers the weighty broader implications of America's Cold War policy objectives in addressing the replicability of the Korean “miracle” to other countries.
Publisher
Contributor
Tornyenu, Daniels Dodzi (author), (Samuel Quainoo, Ph.D.) (Thesis advisor), (Ko Mishima, Ph.D.) (Committee member), (Adam McGlynn, Ph.D.) (Committee member), East Stroudsburg University of Pennsylvania Political Science (Degree grantor)
Date
2020-12-19
Type
Text, Thesis
Format
electronic
Identifier
strou:148
Source
Language
eng
Relation
Coverage
Rights
author